Meeting note tools promise clarity, but they behave very differently once real conversations begin.
Otter, Fireflies, and Fathom all capture meetings, but they optimize for very different outcomes.
This comparison focuses on accuracy, automation, and how much control you retain over what gets captured, summarized, and remembered.
Some links on this page may be affiliate links. If you choose to sign up through them, AI Foundry Lab may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
The Real Decision You’re Making
You are choosing between:
- Raw transcription vs curated summaries
- Automation vs control
- Passive capture vs intentional review
The right tool depends less on features and more on how meetings function in your work. Some teams need exhaustive records. Others need fast clarity and follow-through.
Otter
What Otter Does Well
Otter is strongest at capturing conversations exactly as they happen. It excels at:
- Live transcription
- Searchable conversation history
- Speaker identification
It prioritizes completeness and accuracy over interpretation.
Where Otter Breaks Down
Otter can struggle when:
- Transcripts become dense and time-consuming to review
- Manual scanning is required to find key points
- Noise outweighs signal in frequent meetings
Otter records everything, but it does not decide what matters.
Who Otter Is Best For
Otter is a strong fit for:
- Interviews
- Lectures
- Detailed record-keeping
- Research and reference workflows
👉 View Otter’s transcription plans
Fireflies
What Fireflies Does Well
Fireflies emphasizes automation and scale. It focuses on:
- Automated capture
- Tagging and summaries
- Integrations with CRMs and collaboration tools
Fireflies is designed to run in the background and process meetings with minimal manual effort.
Where Fireflies Creates Friction
Fireflies can fall short when:
- Important nuance gets abstracted away
- Summaries feel too generalized
- Teams need to trust automation without review
It trades precision for speed and coverage.
Who Fireflies Is Best For
Fireflies works best for:
- Sales teams
- Recurring meetings
- CRM-driven workflows
- Organizations that value automation over detail
👉 Explore Fireflies’ meeting automation
Fathom
What Fathom Does Well
Fathom prioritizes clarity and ease of use. It emphasizes:
- Highlights
- Clean summaries
- Minimal setup
Fathom is designed to make reviewing meetings fast and painless.
Where Fathom Breaks Down
Fathom is more limited when:
- Customization is required
- Meetings extend beyond common video platforms
- Long-term archival or deep search matters
It focuses on immediate usefulness rather than comprehensive records.
Who Fathom Is Best For
Fathom is a good fit for:
- Managers
- One-on-one meetings
- Lightweight note capture
- Teams that want fast takeaways
👉 See how Fathom captures meeting highlights
The Bottom Line
Meeting tools do not replace listening.
They reduce the cost of remembering.
Otter is best when accuracy and records matter most.
Fireflies fits teams that value automation at scale.
Fathom works when clarity and quick review are the priority.
The best tool matches how meetings actually influence decisions in your work.
Related Guides
Alternative AI Tools
Examines why teams look for alternatives when tools stop fitting real workflows, and how different design choices change behavior as work scales.
Otter Alternatives
For teams that want summaries, automation, or less manual review than transcript-first tools provide.
Fireflies Alternatives
Helpful when always-on capture produces too much noise and not enough signal.
Fathom Alternatives
Useful if simplicity is no longer enough and deeper transcripts or integrations are required.